Friday, April 8, 2011

President Zardari vs. Jang Group: All Hail The Pakistani Commander-in-Chief



Imagine this: despite one of the world’s top five standing armies and nuclear arsenals, an important strategic location, 170 million in human resource, and great economic potential, and yet Pakistan’s elected democratic rulers are fighting a pitched battle with a media organization. Just a media organization.

This is what President Asif Ali Zardari, the commander-in-chief, is doing in his protracted, proxy battle with the Jang Group, Pakistan’s largest media conglomerate.

How pathetic that a President of such a big country feels threatened by a media group run by a few journalists. Media management is an art that has eluded Pakistan’s political and military rulers. They just don’t get it. So Mr. Zardari’s aides hound the media group in multiple ways: blocking federal government advertisements, ordering the state-run media to produce counter-programs to the popular political talk shows on Jang’s television network, and try to scuttle Jang’s exclusive rights to broadcast sporting events.

The latest move by President Zardari’s government is to shut down Geo Super’s broadcast rights in Pakistan, leaving this subsidiary of Jang’s Geo Network with the expensive option of beaming its programming from a location outside Pakistan.

None of the successive Pakistani governments, including the five governments of President Zardari’s US-backed PPPP, paid any attention to developing a healthy sports culture in the country. The entire Pakistani political and media cultures are structured to provide maximum coverage to boring, divisive and destructive politics. There are no government-maintained sports facilities for the general public anywhere across the length and breadth of this 170-million-plus nation. Those that exist are few, privately-owned, and exclusive.

In fact, you won’t believe it if I tell you that a tennis court next to a commercial market in the F-6 sector of Islamabad is probably the only public tennis facility of its kind anywhere not just in the federal Pakistani capital but also in any one of the five provincial/state capitals.

In other words, if any businessman were to launch a 24/7 sports channel in Pakistan, it would be a losing proposition. You can’t make money from sports in a country that has no sports on the ground. A few dying national sports teams in squash, football, hockey, cricket and others don’t count.

So Jang’s sports channel was a money drain. And now that’s gone too.

It probably won’t make a dent in the media’s group’s earnings, and the only victims might by the staff. As for the public, they are left with two options:

One, to watch the recycled faces of Pakistani politicians as they grace dozens of talk shows every night regaling the nation with their absurdities and bad manners, barring of course a distinguished few.

And two, to watch self-styled religious channels where very few truly respectable individuals exist, with proper religious education from renowned Islamic schools. The rest offer multicolored turbans and opinions. I have talked to respectable Egyptian and Saudi men of religion and they are embarrassed by what we in Pakistan have to contribute to religion.

No wonder ours is a fatalistic nation, where doom and gloom abounds and most people have nothing to do after a day’s work except watching political TV.

My advice to Jang Group is simple: hit back. Don’t take the closure of your sports channel lying down.

Jang, with its influential talk shows and newspapers, has a unique ability to influence Pakistani public opinion. What it should do is to DOWNGRADE all politicians affiliated with the ruling coalition and its partners. All of them.

Yes. Downgrade them. How? Simple.

It should stop making them heroes by rotating them on its different talk shows every night, giving them free publicity and valuable airtime. It should do what one of its hosts, Saleem Safi, has admirably done: minimize the appearance of politicians on his show unless relevant to the story of the day and substitute them with other more intelligent Pakistanis.

Only a fraction of the 1,000 or so elected Pakistani politicians bore us every night on TV. There are many Pakistanis who can talk politics with more sense and creativity than many of these elected nincompoops. [Remember this: in Pakistan, the lowest you are in the cultural and intellectual development ladder, the bigger your chances of being elected and becoming Pakistan’s newest ‘democratic warrior’.]

So good for you, Mr. President. Don’t let us interrupt you. Please continue your battle against the media group. We have already wasted the first decade of the 21st century. We have nine to go and we’ll manage that with this kind of ruling elite.

3 comments:

  1. You should reveal to your readers that you write a weekly columnist for the News, a Jang Group publication.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Present corrupt lot of rulers will do everything to keep people in the darkness of ignorance. Media is their beiggest enemy which is trying to expose their corruption and their true dark faces. Shame on these politicians. Can't we even speak against OUR PUBLIC SERVANTS now? Is this democracy? We need a change. We need a Anna Hazare in Pakistan too. NOW.
    OUr dream setup would look like this:
    http://ihaveadream-pakistan.blogspot.com/p/outline-plan.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. What can I say! Over the years your articles have become very disappointing. I use to like reading your articles but your comments regarding religion are become very disturbing and for someone of you intellectuality it's sad to see your level of religious knowledge. You keep going on about how religion should be and keep giving an example of the Saudi's. Yet you say that you have a deep knowledge of politics and yet you do not know much about the history of Al Saud (House of Saud) and Saudi Arabia or you do but are playing ignorant. There is so much history and evidence available from Muslims and non-Muslims about the corrupt Al Saud family and their extremist views of Islam and yet you keep saying that they represent true Islam. You really are a joke. The Al Saud family came into power with help from the so called Lawrence of Arabia from the Ottoman Empire. Before the Al Saud family took power, Islam in Arabia was in its purist form but when the Al Saud (Wahhabis) family took over they corrupted Islam with their fanatical ways. Because of these fanatics Islam has been blamed for all the worlds trouble. Before 9/11 Islam was envied around the world but now its blamed for almost everything bad. Impressions from your articles suggest that you have been around the world or maybe I might be wrong there, if you have a look around the world from different continents you will see that true Islam is very much different from the Wahhabi Islam that is in Saudi Arabia. Majority of Muslims follow Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat Islam, which is the majority and the prophet Mohammed (s.a.a.w.) told his ummah about and follow the majority. You criticise people who wear 'multicoloured turbans' but you forget that what they are wearing is called an imama and was a sunnat of the prophet Mohammed (s.a.a.w.), unlike you they try to copy the sunnat of the prophet Mohammed (s.a.a.w.) were as you try to copy non-Muslims. So tell me who's better you or them? A question to AQ, were did you get your education from? Its easy to point fingers at other people but one finds it hard to find any fault in himself, so you should really look at your self before you start blaming and criticising others. These 'self-styled religious channels' are doing a better job then those talk shows or your articles. I hope to get a reply from you! Thanks

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please do observe common courtesy rules. This blog is linked to PakNationalists.com and follows the same comment guidelines. The purpose of this blog is to promote the views of PakNationalists on Pakistan's domestic and foreign policy interests.