The Indian-backed terrorism and insurgency in Sri Lanka has finally been defeated.
Like the Pakistani military, the Sri Lankans have come to realize that this is not a civil war. This is a foreign-backed trouble. The funniest part of Indian-backed terrorism in Sri Lanka is that it was quite clear where the money, arms and support was coming from. The terrorists were cornered in a tip of the island closest to the southern part of India. No matter how hard the Sri Lankan military pounded these terrorists, they would come back the next day with more weapons. A couple of times the terrorists returned with small planes!
So the Sri Lankan military did what the Pakistani military is doing now. First, both recognized that terrorism is not indigenous. It is supported from the outside. In Pakistan's case, it was backed from the Afghan soil, where there is a growing Indian military and intelligence presence under the guise of humanitarian work fully backed by Pakistan's true allies, the Americans and the Brits.
So the Sri Lankans defeat and kill India's terrorists. This should give hope to the long suffering people of Kashmir, where the Indian army and Indian soldiers have become 'freewheeling rapists', attacking Kashmiri women as a last resort to break the will of the Kashmiri men who want freedom from India at all costs.
The freedom movement in Kashmir is one of the world's most impressive examples of a people's desire for freedom. The mainstream media in Ameirca and Britian, which is full of government poodles and peddlers of lies and deceit, does not cover the atrocities in Kashmir because that hurts the image of their new slave-soldier in Asia, India, whom they want to use against China and as a source for cheap soldiers in Afghanistan to stabilize the faltering American occupation there.
If the Sri Lankans can do it, so can the Kashmiris.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think its interesting to see that Hindu India is having differences with all small countries of this part of the world, which are of course, neighbours of India. India has issues with Pakistan, India does not want to see stable Srilanka, India has always been involved in all sort of terrorist activities in East Pakistan (Although it is Bengladesh but this word never fits in my mind), India always deter Nepal from all of its disgusting activities. So, you see India is having issues with all neighbours. Although India is having issues with China too but they can not afford direct confrontation with China. As China is more stronger than Hindu India, here India plays a RAM RAM role with China. RAM RAM role is a teaching of CHANAKIYA where he teaches its followers that they should remain obidient infront of big powers and if big powers want to attack Indians then they should first try to RAM those power by offering them their mothers, sisters and daughters. However, Chanakya told them that Hindus should try to use all dirty tricks to get rid of that power.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, Here we need to find the root cause of the problem that why Pakistan is not having issues with Nepal or Srilanka or East Pakistan or Vice Versa? Why only India is involved in all issues with all of its neighbour. Once again the answer can be found in "Arth-e-Shastar" of Chakakya. Chanakya's teachings are that the Hindu state should maintain bad relations with neighbours and good with the enemies of neighbours. I don't know what is the logic behind this "CH*TYAP*" of an "A**h*le" conspirator.
Ahmed Q,
ReplyDeleteI think you know the truth about Indian involvement in the defeat of LTTE - yet you choose to state otherwise. I can see your favourite boy Md Amir giving you better cheerleading than the cute lasses at S.Africa are giving to IPL
Coming back to the main point:
Sri Lanka’s military triumph over the LTTE including a defined naval deployment against the Sea Tigers — from INDIA.
The aid increased steadily this year but New Delhi asked Colombo to keep it quiet till the election was over.
The Indian military assistance came on a specific request from the Sri Lankan government. The first military medical mission was despatched in April.
But far more significant than that benign assistance was the deployment of three fast attack boats and a missile corvette by the Indian Navy that were specifically tasked to patrol the Palk Straits, search for and catch hold of LTTE fugitives and, if necessary, destroy Sea Tiger craft.
The operation was executed by the Indian Navy’s Southern Command that co-ordinated with the integrated defence staff here. The missile corvette deployed was the INS Vinash, a boat indigenously made and capable of chasing the Sea Tigers’ vessels and pushing them back into Lankan waters to a waiting Lankan navy.
The “sea denial” and “naval blockade” by the Indian Navy was first requested by Colombo in May 2007. Sri Lankan defence secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa requested New Delhi to amend its hands-off policy and be more pro-active with military support for the island’s armed forces.
Lanka made the request after a daring attack by the Sea Tigers on the island of Delft near Jaffna. India was still chary of active military assistance. But it effected a course correction from the end of last year.
The course correction was prompted largely by a growing Chinese presence in Sri Lanka. With India hesitating to supply lethal arms to the Sri Lankan forces, Colombo turned to China and Pakistan. It also gave major port and road-building contracts to Beijing, much to New Delhi’s anxiety. India was to supply radars and was training Sri Lankan military personnel.
And AHMED Q - let me quote STRATFOR for you: INDIA is far ahead of the game than either CHINA, PAKISTAN or USA for a strategic toehold in SRI LANKA.
The old man we have as Prime Minister - do not get fooled by his calm demeanour - he is far lethal than Narendra Modi.
Muhammad Amir, please take your India-Pakistan fight elsewhere.
ReplyDeleteWe in Sri Lanka are appreciative of the help-humanitarian or otherwise, that the Indians gave us. Period. There is no animosity within the 2 of us.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete