Saturday, October 17, 2009

American Lecture In Pakistan Parliament




Something stunning happened today in the fake US-imposed Pakistani democracy.

The Foreign Minister flies to Washington. US tells him the world is red, and he flies back, enters his country's parliament, and gives an hour-long boring lecture where he tries to tell them that the world is indeed red and proudly quotes American statements supporting this. And then his government shuts down the proceedings and stops the reperesentatives of the Pakistani nation from voting on whether they believe the Foreign Minister's assertion that the world is red.

This is ironic because this is, in essence, a US-imposed democracy, a democracy with American liking.   If you want a democracy that is not American, then look at Turkey, Iran, and Hamas.  Those elections weren't American-imposed.

In Pakistan we have a government tailored in Washington DC, where US officials struck a 'deal' with former ally Musharraf to ease the current Pakistani rulers into power so that they could continue Musharraf's misguided pro-US policies.

Is this what our American friends call democracy?

Consider the following:

A majority in the parliament, media and the public opinion is disturbed at the offensive language in some clauses of a US aid bill, the Kerry-Lugar bill, which ordinary Pakistanis call the ' Kill Bill' in their cell phone text messages.

The Parliament runs a heated three-day debate over the issue.

Today, Friday, a resolution was supposed to be passed concluding the debate and giving the parliament's take on the American aid bill. The US-imposed 'democractic' government stopped this because it didn't suit the Americans.

The foreign minister should be ashamed of himself.  If he really believed the Kerry-Lugar bill is the best thing to happen to Pakistan after Independence, then he should have stuck to what he said in the press conference with Hillary Clinton. He should have declined when President Zardari and Prime Minister Gilani asked him to go back to Washington with reservations on the bill.  But since he did go back, he should have done justice to those reservations and not accept an 'explanatory' lollypop given to him by Kerry and Berman.

Does Foreign Minister Qureshi have a mind of his own or is he used to people slapping him around and walking all over him?  What was the need for an hourlong emotional speech in Parliament in defense of senators Kerry and Berman?

This Pakistani ruling class has put down the heads of all Pakistanis in shame.  Without drastic steps, this leadership will give Pakistanis a lot of pain in the days to come.

3 comments:

  1. This was only to be expected from our puppet of a Foreign Minister, who merely repeats what is fed to him by others. The way this puppet-on-strings danced in Washington, and is now dancing in Pakistan's Parliament, is embarrassing in the extreme - no wonder Hillary Clinton acknowledged that she could not have stated the American position more eloquently! Why, oh why, was this puppet sent back to Washington all by himself - wasn't it abundantly clear that he needed a puppeteer to keep him in step with the mood of the nation? A sensible handler should have accompanied him on his travels!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you Sakib, in fact, you know I had the feeling that Obama will sign this bill without caring what the people of Pakistan think. Man these people are really desperate for their damn new world order.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think a little different. The way our minister alienated his points in favour of KL bill was exceptional. The first non militry bill ever in history we should welcome it. As a responsible nation we should observe read analyse the true facts to give a true openion as there are certain ignorant elements in society creating fuss.

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please do observe common courtesy rules. This blog is linked to PakNationalists.com and follows the same comment guidelines. The purpose of this blog is to promote the views of PakNationalists on Pakistan's domestic and foreign policy interests.