Thursday, February 4, 2010

Was Head Money Paid For Aafia Siddiqui?

Advocates of, and apologists for, the US government's position on Pakistani scientist Dr. Aafia Siddiqui are arguing that she was a member of an al Qaeda sleeper cell and that she held extreme views.

This line of reasoning seeks to undermine the stronger case that exists in favor of the wrongs done to her, and the wrongs that US and the Pakistani governments have done to the rights and honor of Pakistani citizens.

There is little doubt that Dr. Siddiqui had weird ideas. She also tried hard to get in contact with al Qaeda terrorists wanted by law. And she is probably not telling the whole truth about her activities and intentions.

But it is also true that:

- She was tortured and turned into a human wreck
- She was illegally flown to the United States
- She was kidnapped in Pakistan
- Her kidnappers used her underage children to blackmail her
- Washington or Islamabad possibly tried to use her to inflitrate al Qaeda under duress
- The lives of her three underage kids, who are Pakistani citizens, have been destroyed
- She has not committed any act of terror
- US government has failed to prove her ties to al Qaeda [the excuse that US government is giving for this is that this would expose intelligence sources]
- US government's case on her attempt to kill US agents is fraught with legal loopholes
- Her indictment came because of the fear of terror manipulated by the US government more than the strength of evidence against her

Our contention is that she didn’t actually commit any act of terror. She is guilty of contacting people wanted by law. It is wrong to torture her like this until death. It is wrong to kidnap Pakistanis from our streets. It is wrong to destroy the lives of her three underage kids, who are Pakistani citizens, while the Pakistani government does nothing.

Other countries, including the US, do everything to protect their own citizens even when they have committed crimes. In US government's case, pressure was applied on foreign governments to hand back US citizens involved in prosecutable crimes, in places as diverse as Italy [murder], Iran [espionage] and Japan [rape by US soldiers].

In Dr. Aafia’s case, she’s received more than her share of punishment for committing no crime really, and her arrest through kidnap from Pakistan’s streets is wrong as a principle.

A point to ponder: someone in Pakistan pocketed the head money that US government put on her. As if it's not enough that Washington meddles in Pakistani politics and tries to influence who comes to power in our country, we have a rotten political system where people in politics, bureaucracy and military collude in humiliating Pakistani citizens. This has to stop.

Is the incumbent pro-US Pakistani government reluctant to take a stand on Dr. Aafia's case because head money was paid for her?

Why Pakistan's rulers ignore the wider implications of this case: the systematic way of humiliating Pakistani citizens that has become a policy under the so-called war on terror, practiced in the US and the UK? 

We want the government of Pakistan to stand up for its citizens. Period.

If it can't, Pakistanis should change this failed political system and replace it with new faces unburdened by a client relationship with Washington and London.

14 comments:

  1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8499322.stm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8499322.stm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8499322.stm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8499322.stm

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mr. Adnan, Please read the BBC story that you have posted a couple of times and then ask yourlsef if there is anything in there that "proves" and "justifies" her sentence in NY and the wretched physical condition she is in?

    I am stunned how ready and willing some Pakistanis are to accept the Am-Brit version on anything without asking questions.

    Please ask questions.

    This is not just about Aafia. This is also about an official culture in Pakistan that attaches no value to the life of a Pakistani cititzen. No wonder Pakistanis rot in American and British jails. Even Indians, with some of the worst jail conditions in the world, don't hesitate in jailing Pakistanis for nothing because they know Pakistan won't even bother.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You certainly bring some clarity and levity to this discussion. Thanx and I would like to return and perhaps quote you anon? With permission?

    You have courage by the way a very apt trait for our time!

    And go to oneheartforpeace to see where I should go next on this issue? I followed the trial upclose the entire time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear AQ, Afia was handed to the USA by your favourite leader Musharaf and its pity u still portray him as a hero.

    ReplyDelete
  5. India has again raised its voice to talk over Kashmir Issue. It may be noted India didn't give any signal of solving this issue. I hope these talks are not worthless like in the past. Because the way anti Islamic/Anti Pakistan lobby is at its best trying to destroy Pakistan in all fields of life having India as an active or rather the most active member of it I can just pray to Almighty Allah that these discussions are fruitful & make way for peace & development to prevail in this region.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's pathetic to see people have more faith in people like them, and not in Allah and His Glorious Word: Quran.

    Still many ppl love Musharraf: the pussy general who bowed and prostrated to USA and made a mockery of Pakistan's ideology and religion.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Connie Nash,

    Feel free to quote. I'll check the page you suggested.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dear Khan,

    While I was hosting a talk show on PTV under Mr. Musharraf's govt., I took liberty and a calculated risk by launching a series of shows to make Pakistanis aware about the double game and the deception that the US, or some rogue elements within US government, were practicing against Pakistan and interest interests in Afghanistan.

    No one at the time talked about Mr. Musharraf's ally America in this way.

    I also took the liberty to tell Mr. Musharraf on TV and in my newspaper columns, that he blundered by allying himself with corrupt criminals.

    Many of those politicians in power at the time were not happy at me sayign and writing this and warning Mr. Musharraf about them.

    My objective was to help Mr. Musharraf usehis immense powers to do good for Pakistan, and not for America. So I pointed out the two wrongs mentioned above.

    I had no idea how far he had gone in giving concessions to the Americans inside our country. I must add that many patriotic Pakistanis even within the Pakistani govt had no idea about this.

    And then came the final shock when Mr. Musharraf agreed to help America bring BB and Zardari to power and forgive all the money they stole from Pakistan.

    I stand for PakNationalism. Do you think I would have remained quiet back in 2006 had we known about Dr. Aafia? At least I didn't. And thanks to a British joournalist, Yvonne Ridley, that we know about Dr. Aafia and about what some of us have done to our own people, betraying our faith and trust.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am laughing my head off. When people were on the streets asking for restoration of the Chief Justice simply because he was the ONE person who was trying to get justice to these people sold by Pakistan Army and ISI under Musharraf to the US, you were making fun of the Chief Justice and his supporters. How many lies have you written about them? Now that your hero, Caliph Musharraf, has left Pakistan for good you are raising hue and cry about missing people.

    I am really glad the Pakistani people do not give any heed to your nonsense - they went on protesting for the Chief Justice, when you were against him - and even today they can see through all your shameless lies.

    You claim you did not know about Afia's case in 2006. Well either you are a really pathetic "analyst" where you dont have the skills to read a newspaper - remember missing people case which had enough evidence of Pakistan Army selling people to America as well as the book of your hero Musharraf all have evidence of the people sold - or you're a shameless liar. I may think its a mix of both but trust me, no one takes you seriously and you'll die to your ISI-paid non-relevance very soon

    ReplyDelete
  10. DAddy,

    Your focus is more on attacking me than on having any objective discussion. So it's basically useless to talk to people like you.

    You're welcome to denigrate me anytime, since your real problem is Ahmed Quraishi. I'm afraid I can't help you with that. But don't worry, time is a healer.

    Your twisting is obvious. I am not talking about the missing persons case. I don't know how you link what I said to the lawyers' movement.

    As a PakNationalist, I am opposed to handing over Pakistanis to anyone even if our citizens were guilty. Simple as that. I am a staunch nationalist in such matters.

    Missing persons, well, it depends. I am all for Pakistani security arresting any Pakistani cooperating with CIA and Indian intelligence inside Afghanistan to stir trouble in our country.

    They should be nabbed, law or no law. Pakistan faces exceptional warlike circumstances and we are not Rome. Simple as that.

    As for those Pakistanis who are in US custody, I am sure you know that most of them today were picked up from Afghanistan and were not handed over by Pakistan.

    There are very few cases where Pakistani authorities did this, including the shameful act of handing over Mr. Abdulsalam Zaeef, the Afghan ambassador in Islamabad, to the Americans. And yes, Dr. Siddiqui and possibly a few other cases.

    Correct your information before putting your ignorance on display: in 2006 there was talk about Dr. Aafia being missing. Newspapers weren't talking about her. Pakistani public, including myself, were hardly acquainted with her case. But after Yvonne Ridley's courageous discovery in 2008 and subsequent campaigning, no doubt was left this Pakistani lady was 'kidnapped'.

    Again, Pakistani military and ISI didn't kidnap these people. US-Pakistani cooperation was top secret even inside the country. Most people within the military and ISI didn't even know about many of the details of this cooperation. Mr. Musharraf used his position as army chief to create small pockets of loyal people within the military and intelligence who were assigned to manage the details of this cooperation.

    I took the first steps from within the Mr. Musharraf's camp, using state-run TV's platform, to warn him about concessions to US. I did it in violation of his government's policy. Privately, I sent a memo to one of his advisers to ask him to stop ordering the official media outlets to highlight US support for his government.

    Had I known in 2006 what I knew in 2008, I wouldn't have hestitated in saying it publicly.

    Another thing which I criticized him on, publicly since 2005, is his decision to ally himself with discredited politicans.

    People like me hoped to convince Mr. Musharraf to use his immense powers for Pakistan.

    As for your kind remark that no one takes me seriously, well, the less said the better, but thank you for coming here and reading and commenting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Dear AQ,
    I have noticed that you get defensive when people rebuke you for your support to Musharraf..and i can feel a strain in your answers...Please don't get agitated when people rebuke you for supporting Musharraf. I have a very simple answer, no one is perfect and every one makes mistakes (EVERYONE)....show me one PERFECT leader in the annals of history and I would quit my stance. I respect Musharraf because his patriotism is beyond reproach..and that he took decisions (considerting the ground situations) in the best interest of Pakistan...whether those decisions turned right or bore the intended results is a different story.....He no doubt has made some blunders (NRO beign the mother of all blunders) but then isn't man prone to blunders....???
    In the end i have his 7 years that i compare with the times before and the results are clear...that here we have a man who has proven abilities to lead a nation....
    And another sickness that afflicts pakistanis is that we blame others for our own stupidities....NRO may have allowed Zardaris back into Pakistan...but who voted them in?????

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dear AQ,

    Regarding the Lawyers Movement and the CJ restoration...i still know for a fact that the corruption accusations filed in the reference against CJ were true....but have they been discussed in a court of law?....has the court proven the innocence of CJ in terms of the allegations in the reference? the answer is NO....
    i still feel that we got duped and in the end what we have at the moment is what we wanted....CJ, Parliament and Zardari....so why complain..

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dear AQ,

    Sice you are a journalist...please read the book "All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror" by stephen kinzer, and read it in perspective of the lawyers movement, and many things will become clear to you....the problem is that Pakistanis, including the educated class, are not fond of reading, let alone reflecting and analysing....as a result we form opinions based on what journalists/anchormen and mullahs tell us...

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ahmed,

    You have at least admitted that some elements of Pakistan's secret services have been guilty of obscene collaboration with their American counterparts. Thank you. From this you should really go on and make meaningful comments about the 'missing persons', a case that the Supreme Court judges have described bigger than that of NRO.

    You might care to read the latest post in my blog on this subject:

    http://sakibahmad.blogspot.com/2010/02/case-of-missing-persons.html

    ReplyDelete

Your comments are welcome. Please do observe common courtesy rules. This blog is linked to PakNationalists.com and follows the same comment guidelines. The purpose of this blog is to promote the views of PakNationalists on Pakistan's domestic and foreign policy interests.